ne in four consumers in the US and UK believes that vegetarian products should not be allowed to have meat-related names like sausage or burger, a survey has found. Specialist PR agency Ingredient Communications commissioned polling experts Surveygoo to explore attitudes to the way meat-free products are named. Nearly 1,000 consumers were surveyed (499 in the UK and 484 in the US). The sample included vegetarians, vegans, pescatarians and meat eaters. The results suggest that it is time for a debate about the way vegetarian and vegan products are presented.

Across all groups, 25 percent of respondents said manufacturers of vegetarian products should not be permitted to use meat-related names like sausage, burger or steak. Perhaps unsurprisingly, vegetarians were the least likely to disapprove of meat-related names, with only 18 percent supporting a ban. But interestingly, by contrast, 33 percent of vegans and 26 percent of meat-eaters said vegetarian products should not be allowed to have meat-related names.

The survey also revealed a significant difference between vegetarians and vegans when it came to purchasing decisions. Nearly half of the vegetarians surveyed (49 percent) said they were more likely to buy a meat-free product if it was labeled with a word such as sausage, burger or steak. However, only 19 percent of vegans said the same, with 57 percent saying they were less likely to buy a product if it carried a meat-related name.

Neil Cary, Managing Director of Surveygoo, said: “One of the most interesting findings from this research is the extent of the difference between vegetarians and vegans. Vegetarians seem to prefer products that mimic traditional meat formats, but this is a turn-off for many vegans. The obvious lesson for manufacturers and marketers of plant-based products is that vegetarians and vegans are distinct consumer categories, with vastly different purchasing preferences.”

The way meat-free products are presented has become a political issue in both Europe and the US. In 2017, the European Court of Justice prohibited dairy product names for non-dairy products, such as milk. Last year, France passed legislation prohibiting vegetarian products from being labeled in the same way as traditional animal products. And in the US, companies in Missouri are now prohibited from “misrepresenting a product as meat” if it is not derived from livestock or poultry.

Among survey respondents who approved of vegetarian products with meat-related names the most common reason was that “it describes the nature and format of the product accurately,” a view held by 58 percent of all respondents and 65 percent of vegetarians. However, 60 percent of those who disapproved believed that meat-related names are misleading.

The respondents were also asked to pick their preferred terms for vegetarian products if meat-related names were banned. The top name for sausages was “rolls,” the top name for burgers was “patties,” and the most popular name for vegetarian steaks was “portions.”

In July 2017, we reported how a judgment from the Court of Justice of the European unio that purely plant-based products cannot, in principle, be marketed with designations such as "milk," "cream," "butter," "cheese" or "yogurt," which are reserved by EU law for animal products. A similar debate may well follow within the meat alternatives sector, wher an almost daily wave of innovation is taking place.